Connect with others who understand.

  •   Learn from expert-reviewed resources
  •   Real advice from people who’ve been there
  •   People who understand what you’re going through
Sign Up Log In
Powered By
Real members of MyBCTeam have posted questions and answers that support our community guidelines, and should not be taken as medical advice. Looking for the latest medically reviewed content by doctors and experts? Visit our resource section.
A MyBCTeam Member asked a question 💭
Traverse City, MI

I am 6 weeks out from a dmx and at the same surgery went straight to implant. I am a 63yr old female diagnosed with Invasive lobular breast cancer in my right breast. er+pr+her2- Largest area was 1.6cm, though there were 2 other tumors in the same breast. No cancer was found in the left breast. I had one sentinel lymph node on the right side removed and it showed a 1mm metastaticis . I have met with the med oncologist and will be starting anastrozole in early January. I met with the… read more

4 days ago
 · 
Be the first to react
MyBCTeam

It's completely understandable to feel conflicted — this is a genuinely nuanced decision, and many MyBCTeam members have wrestled with the same question. There's no universally "right" answer here, which is exactly why it feels so hard.

Here's a balanced way to think through the key factors at play:

Reasons some people Show Full Answer

It's completely understandable to feel conflicted — this is a genuinely nuanced decision, and many MyBCTeam members have wrestled with the same question. There's no universally "right" answer here, which is exactly why it feels so hard.

Here's a balanced way to think through the key factors at play:

Reasons some people consider skipping radiation:
- A relatively small absolute benefit (3.5% reduction in recurrence risk in your case)
- A 10% chance of implant damage is a real and meaningful risk
- Anastrozole (hormone therapy) already provides significant protection for ER+/PR+ cancers
- Age and overall health can factor into how much benefit radiation provides

Reasons some people choose radiation:
- Even a 3.5% reduction matters to some people personally
- The lymph node involvement, even micro-metastasis, can increase recurrence risk
- It provides a "backup" if hormone therapy needs to be stopped due to side effects
- Multiple tumors in the same breast can sometimes influence the recommendation The lymph node finding is worth discussing further with your oncologist. Even a 1mm metastasis means cancer cells were present beyond the breast, which is one reason radiation after mastectomy is sometimes recommended — to target any remaining microscopic cells that surgery couldn't reach.

The point your radiation oncologist made about radiation acting as a safety net if anastrozole becomes intolerable is also worth weighing seriously. Side effects from hormone blockers are common, and not everyone can stay on them long-term.

A second opinion from another radiation oncologist is always a reasonable step when you're this uncertain — it's not disloyal to your care team, it's just smart. Some people also find it helpful to ask their oncologist: *"If I were your family member, what would you recommend and why?"*

Ultimately, this decision belongs to you, and whatever you choose should feel aligned with your values, your risk tolerance, and your quality of life priorities. You're asking exactly the right questions. 💙

4 days ago

Related Questions

View All
A MyBCTeam Member asked a question 💭
Hebo, OR

A MyBCTeam Member asked a question 💭
Pittsburgh, PA